Python 2.7 和 3.4:为什么test_unexpected_error测试会抛出错误而不是失败?import unittestclass TestLists(unittest.TestCase): def test_unexpected_error(self): self.assertEqual([0] * 1000 + [1], [1] + [0] * 1000) def test_fails_as_expected(self): self.assertEqual([0] * 1000 + [1], [0] * 1000 + [0])if __name__ == '__main__': unittest.main()错误是:RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object回溯(删节 - 递归错误是递归错误是递归错误是......)Traceback (most recent call last): File "sotest.py", line 7, in test_unexpected_error self.assertEquals([0] * 1000 + [1], [1] + [0] * 1000) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 513, in assertEqual assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 743, in assertListEqual self.assertSequenceEqual(list1, list2, msg, seq_type=list) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 722, in assertSequenceEqual pprint.pformat(seq2).splitlines())) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/difflib.py", line 920, in compare for line in g: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/difflib.py", line 1038, in _fancy_replace for line in self._fancy_helper(a, best_i+1, ahi, b, best_j+1, bhi): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/difflib.py", line 1051, in _fancy_helper for line in g: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/difflib.py", line 1038, in _fancy_replace for line in self._fancy_helper(a, best_i+1, ahi, b, best_j+1, bhi): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/difflib.py", line 1051, in _fancy_helper for line in g: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/difflib.py", line 1038, in _fancy_replace for line in self._fancy_helper(a, best_i+1, ahi, b, best_j+1, bhi): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/difflib.py", line 1051, in _fancy_helper for line in g:
1 回答
慕的地6264312
TA贡献1817条经验 获得超6个赞
这看起来是一个已知的错误。
如果您不希望单元测试在失败时显示列表之间的差异,您可以执行以下替代测试:
self.assertTrue([0] * 1000 + [1] == [1] + [0] * 1000)
添加回答
举报
0/150
提交
取消