优化前：
?
| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647 | select count(t.id) from test t where t.status = 1 and t.id not in (select distinct a.app_id from test2 a where a.type = 1 and a.rule_id in (152, 153, 154)) 17:20:57 laojiu>@plan PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT————————————————————————————————————————-Plan hash value: 684502086 —————————————————————————————-| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |—————————————————————————————-| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 18 | 176K (2)| 00:35:23 || 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 18 | | ||* 2 | FILTER | | | | | ||* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| test | 1141 | 20538 | 845 (2)| 00:00:11 ||* 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| test2 | 1 | 12 | 309 (2)| 00:00:04 |—————————————————————————————- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):————————————————— 2 – filter( NOT EXISTS (SELECT /*+ */ 0 FROM “test2″ “A” WHERE “A”.”type”=1 AND (“A”.”RULE_ID”=152 OR “A”.”RULE_ID”=153 OR “A”.”RULE_ID”=154) AND LNNVL(“A”.”APP_ID”<>:B1))) 3 – filter(“T”.”status”=1) 4 – filter(“A”.”type”=1 AND (“A”.”RULE_ID”=152 OR “A”.”RULE_ID”=153 OR “A”.”RULE_ID”=154) AND LNNVL(“A”.”APP_ID”<>:B1))Statistics———————————————————- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 1762169 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 519 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 492 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 0 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed21 rows selected. |
优化后：
?
| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849 | select count(*) from( select t.id from test t where t.status = 1 minus select distinct a.app_id from test2 a where a.type = 1 and a.rule_id in (152, 153, 154))17:23:33 laojiu>@plan PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT————————————————————————————————————————-Plan hash value: 631655686 ————————————————————————————————–| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |————————————————————————————————–| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | | 1501 (2)| 00:00:19 || 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | | | || 2 | VIEW | | 1141 | | | 1501 (2)| 00:00:19 || 3 | MINUS | | | | | | || 4 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1141 | 20538 | | 846 (2)| 00:00:11 ||* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| test | 1141 | 20538 | | 845 (2)| 00:00:11 || 6 | SORT UNIQUE | | 69527 | 814K| 3632K| 654 (2)| 00:00:08 ||* 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| test2 | 84140 | 986K| | 308 (2)| 00:00:04 |————————————————————————————————– Predicate Information (identified by operation id):————————————————— 5 – filter(“T”.”status”=1) 7 – filter(“A”.”type”=1 AND (“A”.”RULE_ID”=152 OR “A”.”RULE_ID”=153 OR “A”.”RULE_ID”=154)) 21 rows selected.Statistics———————————————————- 1 recursive calls 0 db block gets 2240 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 516 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 492 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 2 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1 rows processed |
在优化sql的时候，我们需要转变一下思路，等价的改写sql；
改写后的sql由于逻辑读得到了天翻地覆的改变，很快得到结果。
第一条sql执行计划中有一个函数，LNNVL(“A”.”APP_ID”<>:B1)，lnnvl(exp)
如果exp的结果是false或者是unknown,那么lnnvl返回true;
如果exp的结果是true,返回false.
点击查看更多内容
为 TA 点赞
评论
共同学习，写下你的评论
评论加载中...
作者其他优质文章
正在加载中
相关文章推荐
感谢您的支持，我会继续努力的～
扫码打赏，你说多少就多少
赞赏金额会直接到老师账户
支付方式
打开微信扫一扫，即可进行扫码打赏哦